<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Council committee votes on lobbyists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ellensmith.org/blog/2007/12/11/council-committee-votes-on-lobbyists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ellensmith.org/blog/2007/12/11/council-committee-votes-on-lobbyists/</link>
	<description>I&#039;m Ellen Smith, member of the Oak Ridge City Council. Thank you for visiting my blog and reading my views on public and private life in and around Oak Ridge, Tennessee. This website is my own; content here does not represent the official policies or views of the City of Oak Ridge. To add your own comments, click on the topic title to open a comment box. To read posts about a particular topic, scroll down to &#34;Categories&#34; (in the sidebar) or use the &#34;Search&#34; box in the sidebar. Look under &#34;Archives&#34; to see collections of past posts organized by date.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 13:01:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Smith</title>
		<link>http://ellensmith.org/blog/2007/12/11/council-committee-votes-on-lobbyists/comment-page-1/#comment-32884</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellensmith.org/blog/?p=76#comment-32884</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Ray. I think we are in agreement, although I don&#039;t think Oak Ridge could handle a World&#039;s Fair or Olympic venue! 

For the record, city staff says that Ferguson has saved staff time by doing some of the paperwork that otherwise would have needed to be done by city staff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Ray. I think we are in agreement, although I don&#8217;t think Oak Ridge could handle a World&#8217;s Fair or Olympic venue! </p>
<p>For the record, city staff says that Ferguson has saved staff time by doing some of the paperwork that otherwise would have needed to be done by city staff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Kircher</title>
		<link>http://ellensmith.org/blog/2007/12/11/council-committee-votes-on-lobbyists/comment-page-1/#comment-32708</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Kircher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellensmith.org/blog/?p=76#comment-32708</guid>
		<description>I have seen value in a premise of what our future can be. The value we see in the Ferguson group is not anything more than what our representatives are supposed to be doing. If the representative doesn&#039;t anchor funding for municipal improvements, the representative is voted out.

Looking at other Ferguson Group lobbying efforts, it appears to be the same. This group has only attached their effort to grants that would have been won without a lobbyist for example, water and sewer projects, green ways and police projects. In an effort to say our lobbyists bring value, can I have a response to how our representatives have worked for important municipal projects in Oak Ridge? Arenâ€™t these the people who have taken credit while we pay for lobbyists?

Overall, we are paying for work that would have been done anyway by our representative if our elected council were on top of the proper boards applying for these grants. This redundancy is glaringly apparent and needs to stop. Now if City of Oak Ridge were to bring a World&#039;s Fair or an Olympic venue, then hiring a lobbyist would be worth the value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen value in a premise of what our future can be. The value we see in the Ferguson group is not anything more than what our representatives are supposed to be doing. If the representative doesn&#8217;t anchor funding for municipal improvements, the representative is voted out.</p>
<p>Looking at other Ferguson Group lobbying efforts, it appears to be the same. This group has only attached their effort to grants that would have been won without a lobbyist for example, water and sewer projects, green ways and police projects. In an effort to say our lobbyists bring value, can I have a response to how our representatives have worked for important municipal projects in Oak Ridge? Arenâ€™t these the people who have taken credit while we pay for lobbyists?</p>
<p>Overall, we are paying for work that would have been done anyway by our representative if our elected council were on top of the proper boards applying for these grants. This redundancy is glaringly apparent and needs to stop. Now if City of Oak Ridge were to bring a World&#8217;s Fair or an Olympic venue, then hiring a lobbyist would be worth the value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

